Isaiah 36–39: Rethinking the issues of priority and historical reliability

Joel E. Anderson, Pieter M. Venter

Abstract


Isaiah 36–39 is a coherent literary unity that both holds priority over II Kings 18–20 and reflects a historically reliable interpretation of the events surrounding Sennacherib’s invasion. On a literary level, Isaiah 36–39 shows itself to be a vital piece of the overall literary structure of Proto-Isaiah in that it highlights the fulfilment of Isaiah’s initial Immanuel prophecy in chapters 7–12. The historical occasion for the writing of Isaiah 36–39 is early on during the reign of Manasseh, when opinion in Judah would have been divided over how to interpret the historical events surrounding Sennacherib’s invasion. Isaiah 36–39, therefore, sought to vindicate Hezekiah as a faithful and righteous king, Isaiah as a true prophet and YHWH as the one true God, in contrast to Manasseh’s policy changes that clearly reflected his opinion that Hezekiah was a foolish king, Isaiah was a false prophet and YHWH was not powerful enough to protect Judah.

How to cite this article: Anderson, J.E. & Venter, P.M., 2009, 'Isaiah 36–39: Rethinking the issues of priority and historical reliability', HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 65(1), Art. #123, 7 pages. DOI: 10.4102/hts.v65i1.123


Full Text: PDF


Other AOSIS OpenJournals publications include:

 

 

 

HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
The international standard serial numbers:
ISSN:0259-9422
eISSN:2072-8050

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

AOSIS OpenJournals | Perfecting Scholarship Online

Like us on Facebook

Private Bag X22, Postnet Suite #55, Tygervalley, South Africa, 7536
Tel: 086 1000 381
Tel: +27 (0)21 975 2602
Fax: 086 5004 974
Time zone: GMT +2

Please read the privacy statement.