Original Research
A model NOT to be imitated?: Recent criticisms of Paul
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 57, No 1/2 | a1886 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v57i1/2.1886
| © 2001 Johan Strijdom
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 14 December 2001 | Published: 14 December 2001
Submitted: 14 December 2001 | Published: 14 December 2001
About the author(s)
Johan Strijdom, Department of Classics University of South Africa, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (819KB)Abstract
In this article recent criticisms of Paul are summarised under the headings of ethnicity (Mack), social class (Theissen), gender (Wire) and homoeroticism (Nissinen). Horsley's positive appraisal of Paul's anti-imperial stance is also surveyed. These views are introduced by means of the concept of imitation as a category of social ethics in Paul, the article, concludes with a statement on the morality of reading.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 2413Total article views: 1881