The socio-rhetorical force of ‘truth talk’ and lies: The case of 1 John

Abstract

This article canvassed Greek and Roman sources for discussions concerning truth talk and lies. It has investigated what social historians and/or anthropologists are saying about truth talking and lying and has developed a model that will examine the issue of truth and lying in socio-religious terms as defined by the Graeco-Roman sources. The article tracked down the socio-rhetorical force of truth talk and lies, in terms of how they are strategically deployed to negotiate authority, to exert epistemic control, to define a personal and communal identity and to defend innovation in the midst of competing truth claims. It focused on the New Testament writing (1 John) and demonstrated that the author, in his desire to establish and defend his vision of truth, resorts to a style of truth talk endemic to the literary habits of Graeco-Roman antiquity. In so doing, the author established himself as a credible witness, set himself apart from those propounding falsehoods and, to some extent, distanced himself from the vision of truth propounded in the Gospel of John.

How to cite this article: Neufeld, D., 2011, ‘The socio-rhetorical force of ‘truth talk’ and lies: The case of 1 John’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 67(1), Art. #941, 10 pages. DOI: 10.4102/hts.v67i1.941